Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3936 13
Original file (NR3936 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JRE
Docket No. 3936-13
2014

16 Januery

VaA--o- 3}

 

 

Dear Chief Warrant Officer

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10of the United
States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 16 January 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures app
this Boa Vv
consisted of your application, togeth
submitted in support thereof, your nava/
statutes, regulations and policies.

a. Documentar

hii

tH
MH
@
Q
©)
4K
Q:
9)
iv
Q,
fu

tg

Wd

REter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the 18 March 2013
letter from the President, Combat Related Special Compensation
Board. The Board was not persuaded that the conditions in
question were causally related to a combat. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the panel
members will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. Inthis regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official

naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the

existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,
PF a ee, 6 —
ROBERT D. SALMAN

Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5583 14

    Original file (NR5583 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying fora correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9929 14

    Original file (NR9929 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2120 14

    Original file (NR2120 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board also considered your letters dated 8 August and 13 November 2014 each with enclosures. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9925 14

    Original file (NR9925 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    JSR Docket No: NR9925-14 fu November

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9945 14

    Original file (NR9945 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 4 September 2014, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10582 14

    Original file (NR10582 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings St this Board. It is regretted that the circumstances of your ca that favorable action cannot be taken. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9933 14

    Original file (NR9933 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09154-09

    Original file (09154-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel’ of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2223 13

    Original file (NR2223 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted is Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscienticus consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3839-13

    Original file (NR3839-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your sentence at the SPCM included a bad conduct discharge (BCD). Nevertheless, the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the -existence of probable material error or injustice.